What will happen to Trevor's payment to Charles?

In partnership law, when one partner makes a payment that is due to another partner, the application of that payment typically depends on the nature of the debt and the relationship between the partners. In this scenario, if Trevor makes a payment specifically to Charles, the payment can be applied in its entirety to Charles' credit, reflecting that it is intended for him.

This treatment often arises in the context of obligations that one partner has to another, especially when those obligations are clearly defined or if there are no competing claims from other partners regarding the payment. Therefore, if Trevor's payment is directed to Charles, it is reasonable and legally sound to apply the full amount of the payment to Charles' credit rather than proportionally or equally among multiple credits or accounts.

This conclusion is based on the premise that Trevor's intent is to satisfy his obligation to Charles specifically and that there are no restrictions or stipulations in their partnership agreement that would require the payment to be allocated differently. Applying the payment entirely to Charles' credit maintains the integrity of the transaction between Trevor and Charles and fulfills the obligation as intended.